Spirit of '76, Part Two: Commentary

"When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them to another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

234 years in the making, Patriots from every part of the United States of America gathered in hundreds of rallies to do more than make a statement of remembrance for what our ancestors did.

We re-lived their actions.

The expression is, "History repeats itself."

And that is what happened yesterday. History repeated itself. The original Tea Party was a protest of a burdensome, undesired and undeserved tax imposed by a tyrannical king unwilling to listen to the voice of his subjects.

In Duluth alone more than a thousand gathered to protest the unjust laws being enacted by an uncaring and not-listening gang of representatives. Nation wide there were an estimated 5 million or more.

As did King George those many years ago, King Hussein Obama chose to not listen to the voices of the People.
"Obama skips out on boisterous rally" reads the WaPo headline... but we know better. He didn't 'skip'. Like the coward he is, he ran out of town on the pretext of chatting with NASA 'employees'- none of whom were present at the fund-raiser dinner.
"...Among the thousands of "tea party" protesters that gathered Thursday at Freedom Plaza, a stone's throw from the White House, were dozens of signs directed at President Obama, some demanding "Listen To Me!" others asking "Why Can't You Hear Us?"..."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/16/obama-skips-out-on-boisterous-tea-party/

We know why he couldn't hear us. Our desires do not fit his agenda of creating a nation of servants to his whim.

Now we will see if anyone else listens. Should the PTB in D.C. choose not to...

History repeats itself.

There are detractors of the new Tea Parties. A media that denigrates and marginalizes the people. Tories, subservient and boot-licking to the king, threaten and disrupt the rallies. Politicians in a government who turn deaf ears to the real needs of their employers, treat them like field hands, and worse- ignore them.

Only a fool or someone totally blind and ignorant of what Life is about would choose to allow the history of this nation of Freedom, Peace loving citizens to repeat itself.

"Good morning, Lord. Thank You for giving me one more day to get it right. Today is Friday, April 16, 1776..."

And a shock went through me, my morning ritual of greeting the day, jolting me totally awake as I realized what I'd just said. My next thought was wonder if that is something spoken by John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, or John Q Public, this day 234 years ago.

Did they also awaken the day after their Tea Party and thank God for giving them "one more day to get it right", hoping in their heart that King George would listen?

Did they arise, unshutter their window to look upon a bright morning, hear the bird-song and watch the cool breeze wave the branches of the leafless forest about them, thinking of the duty this day brought? The plowing, the seeding, the cleaning of harness and tools, of feeding their livestock, providing for their own.

Did they wonder what kind of news this day would bring about their actions of the previous day? What would the effect be when the King heard the news?

Did they look to the rifle and powder horn, the bag of round balls hanging above the mantle and say a silent prayer that those tools would not be necessary today?

Did they sip their morning tea in fearful thought of what they'd done- all the while hoping common sense and calm heads would prevail?

Despite it all, did they steel their nerve, resolve to see this issue through to the end, regardless the personal cost, knowing this was not for themselves, but for those soft, joyous faces of the children still sleeping in the rooms above? Knowing it was for those they did not yet know but dreamt of one day bouncing on their knee, of tickling under the chin, of holding close and telling them he loved them. Did they shake their head and rebuke the devils of war invading their thoughts?

Did they wonder about those neighbors who derided and discounted and ridiculed them their actions, their beliefs, their desires to be free, to just be heard by those in power?

Did they wonder upon which of those neighbors could they depend when the moments came to act upon the declaration they'd made yesterday? Could those who agreed in principle yet stood on the sidelines be counted upon to help carry the burden that could soon be thrust upon them all?

In conclusion to yesterday's lakeside event, all who'd served in uniform to this great country were asked to organize to the side of the field. As we stood- nearly one third the attendance, about 400 men and women- in haphazard formation, Lee Greenwood's song "God Bless the U.S.A." was played.

"...I'll gladly stand up next to you and defend Her still today..."

These were men we knew we could count upon because they were there, made their intentions clear, unequivocal. These were men who had already loaded and primed their rifles, had sharpened their knives. Men who knew the taste of fear and the smell of gunpowder and blood upon their hands, who'd seen brothers fall beside them and knew the finality of death's action to life. These were men who'd answered the questions in no uncertain terms, knew the consequences that could come because of their beliefs, their love of country, but most, for love of their family.

These were men with teary eyes worthy of standing beside.

These were Patriots.

Bless God, God bless us in that history need not repeat itself to keep us free.

Shy III

Uh-huh, Of Course...

(Some people even learn to use toilet paper.)

Naturally, when the kids are so rebellious and disobedient we can't control them, we call in the Great Uncle and he teaches us parental skills. Works for me, why shouldn't it work for our elected 'parents'?

"...The mayor said there is another option - and that would be declaring martial law. The governor would have to declare it and then the National Guard would come in. The mayor said it's more for a transition to a new police force if that were to happen...."Capital News 9 24 Hour Local News TOP STORIES Schenectady mayor considers options, martial law over police woes

After all, it wouldn't work for him to actually do psychological and background checks on the people the community hires-- that'd be an infringement of their civil liberties and we know how that would turn out.

And naturally, we must not allow anyone, especially those who disagree with us, to be allowed their Constitutional Rights: that would be an assault on our senses and so dangerous for anyone who wants to have a little insurance they could protect themselves if needed. And, golly, defending ourselves is so very irrelevant because we have the fuzz to protect us. Right?

"...An orderly society is the goal," concluded their report. "Public safety is the paramount consideration. The fact that public clamor has reached the ears of politicians is irrelevant. The immediate revocation will get the issue back to square one. At that time, deserving individuals will qualify and others will be denied...."

Sheriff revokes gun permit of Carona ally and GOP heavyweight hutchens, permits, county, gun, issue - News - OCRegister.com

Naturally, we have the military to protect our best interests as a nation. So why don't we empower them to do so by giving them the tools they need? After all, they're the ones who we will want to patrol our streets, doing door-to-door warrantless searches, enforcing curfews, setting up roadblocks for 'papers please' checks or any damn thing else their commander's whims dictate. After all, the men and women of our military are just a bunch of torturers and baby killers. Aren't they?

"...Murtha, who publicly accused U.S. Marines of cold-blooded murder in a firefight in Haditha, Iraq, and was caught on camera in the Abscam scandal appearing to negotiate a bribe, was honored by the Navy for his "selfless devotion to the Nation's Sailors and Marines..."

Guess what Murtha has been given by the Navy!

Since our military members are no more than fatherless children who run around beating other children and continually conspire to not fire their weapons upon fellow American citizens, of course we need to insure complete control over their lives.

"...A military commander at Fort Campbell in Kentucky demanded his soldiers give him the registration numbers of any guns they own privately and then reveal where they are stored..."

Military demands details on soldiers' private guns

(Having been a private gun owner in the military, I understand and agreed that so long as I lived in the barracks, my firearms were stored in the Company Arsenal. No problem with that. The problem is the Brass wants the serial numbers, amounts and locations of weapons stored off base in private homes. True, also, the U.S. Military is really not a Democracy, but the troops do not forfeit their Constitutional rights just because they're wearing a uniform. Quite the opposite: they swear to uphold and defend the Constitution with their lives. That alone should give them even more Constitutional privilege, IMO.)

While we're on the path to removing the Constitution from the annals of American history, let us continue our assault on the populace by using fear tactics and ACORN brown-shirting to brow beat those who actually use their rights as citizens of a 'free' nation.

"...A short time later, he said he found two U.S. marshals on his doorstep..."

Man critical of Obama case judge visited by marshals

After all, we can't actually be accusing SCOTUS members of not doing their job, of spitting on the very Document they also swear to defend. Can we? I mean, isn't it just so criminal to expect someone to actually uphold the laws of our Nation?

But by all means, for God's sake, let us not do anything that would entail enforcing any laws that would make us unseemly 'law abiding' people the rest of the world frowns upon. I mean, really-- what's the sense of having a law if you're going to enforce it? What's the sense of that?

"...House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, condemned immigration raids as "un-American...."

Rohrabacher: Dems not 'watching out for American people'

Really: let's get serious here. Why have a law we'd want to enforce? After all, having laws is nothing more than admitting there are certain standards of morality we expect people to live by, certain 'codes' we are to follow if we are to survive as a 'community'. Rather than have laws we need to enforce, let's get rid of the standard by which we make our laws. What good are laws and moral absolutes, anyway?

"...Is Satan a religious fable, or an actual being wreaking havoc in the world?..."

Is Satan for real?

Naturally, if we decide he isn't for real, who the hell will the libs and criminals have to accuse "made me do it"? Literally. Does a decadent society really 'need' a devil, anyway? But wait: if we remove the Devil from the equation, won't those very same people need to accept responsibility for their actions? God forbid they need do that! But wait-- if Satan isn't real, then obviously God isn't real, either. Hmmm... and this will lead us down what path?

Oh, right. Sorry, I forgot. Communists don't believe in God, so why believe in a Devil?

Bless God, God bless.

Shy III